Roger Ebert, 1942-2013

ebertHe’s the guy who made it possible for you, USA, to enjoy the movies not only as entertainment, but also as an art form. He broke through to the American public. He did it. Roger Ebert.

He wrenched the snooty cineaste consciousness away from the closest pop culture champion it had thus far been able to find, Pauline Kael, simply by appearing on tv — and for that he was pilloried his whole life. But by now this was no mere damp-eyed kid. By now, Roger Ebert knew, and communicated, as much about film as did Francois Truffaut and all his Cahiers du Cinema homm[i]es. Yes, Ebert “reviewed” movies on his show with Gene Siskel, another formidable mind, but you always understood they were (1) basically showing you the hits, and (2) even if there was something else behind, they didn’t have time to tell you about it at leisure. But they knew.

Earlier this year at the Sundance Film Festival, I ran into the same guy on line [not online!] for a few different screenings, and he always sat in the same spot at the Eccles Center, the high-school auditorium that’s the festival’s biggest single venue. I’d heard that Ebert had tended to do the same: was this his seat? Nope, the Sundance veteran said, and he pointed to another one that would have allowed Ebert to see the flick and then scoot away during the end-credit roll. Nobody, he said, NOBODY, allowed anyone else to bump Ebert from that particular seat for all those years. Good on you, Sundance.

I’m gonna let more erudite writers send Roger off, as you’ll see in the next week or two. But I wish I could have attended one of his master classes in which he went through a film shot by shot. I wish I could have been there at one of his forgotten-film festivals. Shit: I wish he was still alive. And that’s the whole deal.

4/5/13: Douglas Martin does a great job in the New York Times.

Advertisements

7 Responses to Roger Ebert, 1942-2013

  1. Amen. That’s a wrap.

  2. bpartin says:

    Nicely said, Tom .

  3. Nancy says:

    Right you are, Tom.

  4. Elizabeth Bourne says:

    I was so sorry to hear the news. While I didn’t always agree with him, I understood his reasons. He was one of Mark’s favorite film critics, and became one of mine. A sad day.

  5. Josh Frank says:

    What I always liked about Ebert was how he appreciated the difference between “movies” and “film” and reviewed accordingly. He never critiqued a Bruce Willis action flick as if it were a French art film. He recognized and complimented well-done entertainment even if it was somewhat lacking in serious artistic weight. I’ll never forget his positive review of the low-budget horror flick “Q” starring Michael Moriarty in probably the best performance of his career.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: