Osama bin Laden, 1957-2011


First, can we stop with the criticism that the President is namby-pamby on national security? That corpulent drug addict Rush Limbaugh is already deriding him for alleged overuse of the first-person pronoun in his Sunday night speech, using a Jedi dark side trick to cleanse his own mind of the grotesque flight-suited MISSION ACCOMPLISHED preening of Mr. Obama’s predecessor. But one person has to say, GO: the commander in chief. One person has to, excuse me, pull the trigger. If things had gone better in the Iranian sand for Jimmy Carter in 1980, he would be a national hero and Ronald Reagan would have had to wait four years, maybe forever. That had to be on the President’s mind last weekend, because this was far from a slam-dunk mission. All praise to the brave SEALs, and everybody else who followed the President’s orders at great risk to themselves. But shut up, Rush, when the President of the United States cops to personally ordering troops into harm’s way.

Second, can we agree that American weekly newsmagazines are irretrievably broken? Both Time and Newsweek, which went to press before this happened, feature the royal wedding on their just-landed covers. They lost big on the timing, and now they’re newsstand laughingstocks, unless they rush “special editions” into press – but with what reporting, and who’s gonna pay for it? My hunch: we’ll catch ya next week, America! The only newsweekly which will have a current story is The Economist, which lands in subscribers’ mailboxes on Friday. Oh, by the way: they’re British! And here’s the complete coverage of the royal nuptials in what must now be regarded as the world’s best English-language newsmagazine:

A young man and his fiancée were expected to get married in central
London on April 29th. Millions of Britons took advantage of the
opportunity to take a foreign holiday.

Third, one’s initial reaction must indeed be jubilation: this lousy, privileged bastard who coerced so many down-class acolytes into missions he would be too afraid to perform himself finally got what was coming to him. He preached retrogression, yet chose luxury over the cause, like so many other hypocrites before him. But the American football-style celebrations I saw on tv looked very much like the Arab demonstrations after 9/11. Remove the audio, Photoshop-smudge the pickets and T-shirts, put up an Al Jazeera logo, and what’s the difference? I don’t like the way these images may be playing on the other side of the world. I am a firm believer in the adage, “People are alike all over,” but I fear that malefic others may decide to use our shared zealousness against us.

5/6/11: Time rushed out its next issue, which landed for subscribers by Thursday. It was 70 pages long and had five ads, three of them for drugs marketed to seniors. Newsweek also dropped early, on Friday, 62 pages, similar ad ratio but slightly more upmarket. Rather than doing “special editions,” both mags simply hurried up the next issue — Time even had some non-Osama stuff, but not Newsweek — to get those damned royal-wedding “commemoratives” off the frickin newsstand. They each faced an unusually long span before the next pubdate, and both better hope nothing else earthshaking happens in the meantime, in case they still want to be seen as part of a medium which responds to breaking news. The Economist, 104 pages landing on Friday as usual, complete with the rest of the world’s news, cover-lined: Now, kill his dream. Bin Laden was only one of many stories, and this British mag — now clearly best of breed, my friend — ignored the royal wedding.

7/1/11: Everybody with a deadline misses the big story occasionally, and this week it was The Economist’s turn. All anybody could talk about on Friday was the collapse of the Manhattan DA’s sexual assault case against former International Monetary Fund general manager Dominique Strauss-Kahn over his accuser’s credibility. And it was a big European story as well, perhaps the biggest of the day. But The Economist had already gone to press, and the issue that dropped on 7/1 had no mention of the surprise development.

6 Responses to Osama bin Laden, 1957-2011

  1. Bill Fisher says:

    Here, here Tom. Thanks for clarity and outrage. The demonstrations just made me sad. bin Laden needed to be brought to book. His executed plan has been the excuse for wars that have killed more than a million military personnel and civilians.

    But to celebrate at any death, including his, with chants of USA, USA and more, is a sad commentary indeed.

  2. Janna Silverstein says:

    Remove the audio, Photoshop-smudge the pickets and T-shirts, put up an Al Jazeera logo, and what’s the difference? I don’t like the way these images may be playing on the other side of the world.

    I completely agree, Tom. I said the following on Live Journal:

    People are entitled to how they feel. But I can’t [party on over bin Laden’s death] myself. I think we cheapen everything we’ve done, and all the lives lost to get to this point, by behaving as though we just won a football game. You know when I’ll dance? When we’re out of Iraq and Afghanistan.

  3. jonolan says:

    If these people in other lands willfully choose to equate jubilation over the extermination of something like Osama with the joy they expressed over the deaths of innocents, then they are valid targets for extermination themselves.

    The opinion of such creatures should not intrude overly much upon human consciousness at a large beyond assessing the immediate level of threat they might pose and what steps are needed to remove them.

    • Tom Dupree says:

      “Creatures.” “Extermination.” Hmmm. As with certain Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, you seem uneasy with the concept of “empathy.” Nor do you consider decades of U.S. meddling in the Middle East, such as propping up the Shah of Iran, arming the Afghan Taliban so they could kill Russians, and invading and occupying Iraq for no reason whatsoever. Plenty of innocents went down at our hands. I’m not excusing, only trying to understand, an emotional process which I would recommend highly to you.

  4. Nancy says:

    Ding, dong, the witch is dead.
    However, I do agree that the NCAA/NBA/Superbowl Championship celebrations were a little…much. Note the ages of many of those folks.

Leave a Reply to jonolan Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: